The evaluation of the competition proposals will occur through two rounds of jury review. The first part of the competition's evaluation by the first jury is based on standard criteria: ARCHIVE is looking for proposals that respond to all elements of program. The first judging panel will look favorably on proposals that include multidisciplinary and cross cultural teamwork.
The second jury panel will look to ascertain if a project has a strong conceptual focus. Successful projects will think outside the box, be theoretical and evolve from current knowledge. They should not only absorb the information provided in the Appendices but rather push forward a strong comprehensive idea that is singly notable in the design presented. Value, philosophy, integrity and emotive response are incredibly relevant in a well communicated conceptual proposal.
Jury 1:
- Click the tab above to see the experts involved in narrowing down the initial entries.
- The first round of judges will review projects virtually between Monday, November 15 and Monday, November 22, 2010. Jury 1 will select projects to move forward to the second jury.
Jury 2:
Click the tab above to see the experts involved in narrowing down the final five winning designs. The panel is formed of experts from the fields of health, architecture, and development. Jurors include key representatives from organizations such as the World Health Organization, Partners in Health and Arup.- Between December 3-6, judges for the second panel will come together to decide on five winning proposals for construction in St. Marc, Haiti.
- The finalists from the second round of judging will be posted on Tuesday December 7, 2010.
Awards:
- First place: $5,000 US
- Second place: $3,000 US
- Third place: $2,000 US
- 2 additional projects will receive ARCHIVE design excellence merit awards.
